JURTRANS
  • HOME /
  • ABOUT /
  • VALUES /
  • Services /
  • RESOURCES /
  • BLOG /
  • CONTACT /
  • EN

Our Blog

CULTURAL INCONSISTENCIES IN LEGAL TRANSLATION – Part 2

By John O 'Shea on July 21, 2016 in English legal language and terminology, Greek legal language and terminology, legal language, Legal terminology, Legal Translation, translation of legal documents
Share this post

In one of our previous posts we talked about the cultural inconsistencies in legal translation that often come up and specifically about inconsistencies in the realia. In this post, we are going to talk about the ways in which the legal translator can tackle these inconsistencies.

We gave an example using the term “fiduciary” and its Greek translation, but we concluded that there isn’t an equivalent term that has the exact same meaning and an identical content in the Greek legal system. What needs to be stressed here is the fact that the legal translator is able to reach this conclusion only if he is familiar with the law of both the legal systems involved: the legal system from which the source text comes and the legal system from which the target text comes. Familiarity with the first will enable the translator to have a clear grasp of the meaning, the content and the function of the concept, the term or the realia that he needs to translate. Familiarity with the second will enable him to look for the respective concept, term or realia in the target language.

As in the example that we used in our previous post, in the case where there isn’t an equivalent concept, term or realia, the translator should embrace the interpretative approach, aiming at the same time to ensure that the final recipient of the text will be able to understand it. The target text will be used in the context of a different legal system by people familiar only with their own legal system. The translator’s aim should be to clearly present the foreign legal system, without altering the structure and the legal effect of the text and of course without adding to or subtracting from the amount of information that the final recipient will draw from his translated text.

Hard? Yes. Impossible? No.

In any case, the legal translator should contact his client and advise him about the implications that arise from the inconsistencies of the two cultures involved, as well as about the ways in which he is planning to tackle those cultural inconsistencies in legal translation.

In our example I chose to translate the term “fiduciary” as “διαχειριστής αλλότριας περιουσίας” (administrator of another’s affairs), drawing my inspiration from the concept of “management of another’s affairs/voluntary agency” (διοίκηση αλλοτρίων) in Article 730 of the Hellenic Civil Code. The reason that the English term couldn’t have been translated as “διοικητής αλλοτρίων” (manager of another’s affairs/voluntary agent) is because there is a crucial difference between those two concepts: the agent mentioned in Article 730 of the Greek Civil Code manages the affairs of another person, but acts without authority, while the fiduciary acts under a mandate.

Just like any translator, the legal translator should also cultivate his multiculturalism, as this is a necessary professional tool. Since any form of cross-language communication is also cross-cultural communication (Vlachopoulos, p. 36) and every legal system is created within a specific culture, it is more than necessary for the legal translator to be aware of and be exposed to his own, as well as the foreign culture. This is the very heart of the role of the professional legal translator, as he is the person responsible for transferring the message and the content of the legal text from one culture to the other and finding solutions to the legal inconsistencies in his legal translation.

According to Vlachopoulos, who in turn refers to the research of Maddux & Galinsky in the field of business administration (Vlachopoulos, p. 37), simply knowing the language, as a sum of finite linguistic units and syntactical mechanisms, without being aware of the cultural elements reflected in the usage of a specific word or in the usage of a specific syntactical mechanism and without being conscious of the significance these elements bear in the foreign culture, dooms every effort of cross-cultural communication to failure. In other words, lack of awareness of the cultural parameters defeats creative understanding and leads to a linear and uncritical transfer of structures of the source language to the target language. It leads, above all, to an uncritical transfer of the thought structures of the source culture to the target culture. Vlachopoulos then he goes on to say that it is necessary for the translator to be familiar with the cultures with which he is working, so that, firstly, he can possess the knowledge and the experience that will support his understanding of the target culture and secondly, to be able to assess the acceptance criteria and in this way be able to converge to the highest possible extent with the communication standards that he is required to respect.

In the context of cross-cultural communication, therefore, the skilled legal translator should possess an awareness of the legal culture of both countries and keep himself constantly informed about new legislation, new case-law and the changes taking place in his own, as well as in the foreign legal system.

 

By Eva Angelopoulou

Greek legal language Greek legal translation Legal language Legal translation legal translators
  • ← Previous
  • Next →
Comments ( 0 )

    Leave A Comment
    Cancel Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Search

    JURTRANS BLOG

    This is the home of JurTrans blog, with useful information, articles, hand-picked seminars and conferences in the area of Legal Translation.

    Subscribe

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 897 other subscribers

    CATEGORIES

    • Book Review (7)
    • books on legal translation (3)
    • Conferences (24)
    • Courses (9)
    • Court Interpreting (6)
    • Dictionaries (6)
    • English legal language and terminology (18)
    • EU law (5)
    • Greek language (6)
    • Greek legal language and terminology (18)
    • Greek penal code (2)
    • Hellenic Civil Code (3)
    • Hellenic Code of Civil Procedure (2)
    • Insurance law (1)
    • Legal dictionaries (10)
    • legal language (10)
    • Legal linguistics (21)
    • Legal terminology (39)
    • Legal Translation (100)
    • Legal Translation Quotes (16)
    • liability for translations (1)
    • professionalisation (5)
    • quality of legal translation (6)
    • quality of translation (2)
    • translation of legal documents (12)
    • Μεταφράσεις νομικών κειμένων (11)
    • Νομική μετάφραση (14)

    TAGS

    legal translation conferences Common law liability for translations translator liability translation agency liability professionalisation Technology Words to Deeds Insurance Law EU law legislative drafting translation quality corpuses ποινικός κώδικας adversarial interpreting quality of translation translation blunders international diplomacy who translates matters jurilinguistics νομική μετάφραση machine translation liability for legal translations legal translation hub International Translation Day quality of legal translation Hellenic Code of Civil Procedure Hellenic Civil Code ELETO νομικα μεταφ Greek language Seminar Court Interpreting translation of legal documents νομικές μεταφράσεις Legal discourse legal translators Terminology Legal Dictionaries Greek legal terminology Legal linguistics Conference Greek legal language Greek legal translation Legal language Legal translation

    ARCHIVES

    • February 2021 (3)
    • January 2021 (1)
    • September 2020 (1)
    • March 2020 (1)
    • January 2020 (1)
    • February 2019 (1)
    • October 2018 (2)
    • September 2018 (1)
    • May 2018 (3)
    • December 2017 (1)
    • October 2017 (2)
    • September 2017 (1)
    • August 2017 (1)
    • July 2017 (1)
    • May 2017 (1)
    • April 2017 (1)
    • March 2017 (1)
    • February 2017 (2)
    • December 2016 (2)
    • November 2016 (1)
    • October 2016 (1)
    • September 2016 (3)
    • July 2016 (3)
    • June 2016 (6)
    • May 2016 (9)
    • April 2016 (3)
    • March 2016 (5)
    • December 2015 (3)
    • November 2015 (4)
    • October 2015 (12)
    • September 2015 (3)
    • May 2015 (1)
    • March 2015 (19)
    • February 2015 (6)
    • January 2015 (1)
    • December 2014 (3)
    © Copyright 2014 JurTrans
    By using this site, you agree that we may store and access cookies on your device. Accept Read More
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled

    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

    Non-necessary

    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.